Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Merna Refaat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peeters vs Refaat analysis and find out who is favored!
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Merna Refaat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Refaat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peeters has won 40.54% of points on their second serve, while Refaat has won 39.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peeters, in recent form, has won 57.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Refaat has won 59.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.68% and 43.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peeters has saved 56.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Refaat has saved 51.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peeters has won 50.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 26), with Refaat winning 53.85% (W/L 28/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peeters has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 29). Refaat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 51/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 25/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Peeters has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Refaat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peeters winning 0 times and Refaat being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peeters winning 1 and Refaat winning 1. The last match between Peeters and Refaat was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 06-03-2024, First, Hard with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 4-6 6-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peeters and Refaat have played a deciding set 1 times, with Peeters winning 1 times and Refaat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peeters winning 0, and Refaat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peeters has played against opponents with an average rank of 123.28 while Refaat has played against players with an average rank of 155.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peeters has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Refaat has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peeters has converted 48.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Refaat has converted 55.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
852
Rank
663
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
742
Rank
737
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
56% (75-58)
Career Total W/L
43% (76-101)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Merna Refaat |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 1 |
| Games Won | 10 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) | 57% (30/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (17/27) | 57% (17/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 26% (6/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (30/53) | 41% (21/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 ret. |
Stats 
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Merna Refaat
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | Merna Refaat |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 54% (28/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (241/205) | 51% (238/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| DFs Total | 138 | 148 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:5 | 1:41:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 138.26 | 103.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (857/1417) | 62% (912/1472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (533/857) | 58% (533/912) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (227/560) | 40% (224/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (93/191) | 57% (106/185) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (641/1318) | 49% (694/1422) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 55% (11/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Zi Ying Ruan
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Tilda Hessleryd
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Cecilie Wiche
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
16
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
23 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Maya Drozd
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Merna Refaat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Le Yi Liu
Player
Merna Refaat
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ekaterina Khayrutdinova
Player
Merna Refaat
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Camilla Zanolini
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
80%
(
61 of
76)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
23%
(
7 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
55%
(
40 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Beatrice Stagno
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Eva Garkusha
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
0
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Merna Refaat
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Vaishnavi Adkar
58%
(
61 of
105)
1st Serve %
75%
(
70 of
93)
0
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
3
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
52%
(
55 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
52 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merna Refaat
Player
Abigail Amos
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Peeters Vs Refaat Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
